Case 3322602/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Rodgers v Panalux Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 3322602/2019
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Rodgers
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 52 judgment on withdrawal. The employment judge recorded that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims by the claimants. The extracted text does not contain any findings on the merits of the underlying claims.
No remedy was awarded. The judgment is limited to the dismissal following withdrawal and does not set out any monetary award or split between claims.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims by the claimants. It does not identify the individual causes of action in the extracted text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.