Case 3322618/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Bennett v Herts First Ambulance Service Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3322618/2021
- Decision date
- 15 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Bennett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response having been provided by the respondent, the tribunal entered judgment under Rule 21 for Mr P Bennett on his claim for non-payment of wages and accrued and untaken annual leave entitlement. The tribunal recorded that the respondent was ordered to pay gross outstanding salary of £2,991.78 and gross holiday pay of £3,143.67.
The judgment did not set out any disputed findings on liability beyond the absence of a response. It stated that the sums were gross and may be subject to tax and national insurance deductions as appropriate. The total award ordered was £6,135.45.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded as gross outstanding salary, subject to tax and national insurance deductions as appropriate. | Upheld | — | £2,992 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded as gross holiday pay for accrued and untaken annual leave, subject to tax and national insurance deductions as appropriate. | Upheld | — | £3,144 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,135
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.