Case 3322643/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Did not attend and was not represented For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 3322643/2021
- Decision date
- 24 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Forde Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Did not attend and was not represented For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Watford on 5 April 2023, before Employment Judge Forde, the claimant did not attend and was not represented. The respondent was represented by Miss H Ifeka, counsel. The written judgment records that the claimant’s claims were struck out.
The judgment does not identify the substantive causes of action in the text provided, and it does not record any findings on the merits of the claims. It instead records a costs order requiring the claimant to pay the respondent £15,003 within 28 days of the order. The written record also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons will not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written judgment does not specify the underlying substantive claim type; it records only that the claimant’s claims were struck out. The tribunal also ordered the claimant to pay the respondent £15,003 in costs. | Struck out | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,003
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.