Case 3322666/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Sadruz Zaman v Hornsey Dental Practice and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 3322666/2021
- Decision date
- 15 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin Representation
- Venue
- Watford Hearing Centre
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr Sadruz Zaman
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Sadruz Zaman brought disability discrimination complaints against Hornsey Dental Practice and Mr Ivan Tsipa. The tribunal held that the complaints were presented outside the time limit in s123 Equality Act 2010 and therefore did not proceed to a merits determination.
Having considered the circumstances, the tribunal decided it was not just and equitable to extend time for bringing the complaints. The proceedings were dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written record notes that written reasons would only be provided if requested in accordance with the usual tribunal procedure.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal held that the disability discrimination complaints were presented outside the time limit in s123 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s123 Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable extension of time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.