Case 3322670/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Natalia Opala v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 3322670/2021
- Decision date
- 15 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Natalia Opala
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Ord heard the case at Huntingdon by CVP on 6 September 2023. The respondent did not attend and had not filed a response, so the tribunal heard the claimant in the respondent's absence.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim for unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £177.12. It also upheld the claim that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,055.83.
No other claims, tests, or findings are recorded in the judgment text provided. The total monetary award reflected in the two orders is £1,232.95.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £177 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment says the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £1,056 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,233
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.