Case 3322672/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Mysliwiec v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 3322672/2021
- Decision date
- 15 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Miss A Mysliwiec
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the respondent had indicated the claims were not defended. It then found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £202.61.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,015.52. No separate injury to feelings, basic award, compensatory award, or interest figure was recorded in the judgment, and the decision consists of monetary awards on those two claims only.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent had indicated that the claim was not defended; the tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum. | Upheld | — | £203 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of that sum. | Upheld | — | £1,016 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,218
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.