Case 3322697/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Pavan v Unified Payroll — 2025
- Case reference
- 3322697/2021
- Decision date
- 12 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Pavan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr P Pavan's claim against Unified Payroll. It recorded that the respondent company was in compulsory liquidation and that the permission of the court had not been obtained for the proceedings to continue, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986.
The tribunal also noted that on 22 May 2025 it had given the claimant 14 days to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason.
For those reasons, the tribunal held that the claim should be struck out. The judgment was approved by Employment Judge Quill Date on 1 August 2025 and sent to the parties on 12 August 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying statutory claim type. It records that the claim was struck out because the respondent was in compulsory liquidation and the court's permission had not been obtained under the Insolvency Act 1986, and because the claimant did not provide an acceptable reason after being invited on 22 May 2025 to explain why the claim should not be struck out for lack of active pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.