Case 3322703/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Granza v Mr S Glicksman (trading as Squires Bakery) — 2023
- Case reference
- 3322703/2021
- Decision date
- 5 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Rourke
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Granza
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Reading by video on 5 January 2023 before Employment Judge C H O’Rourke. The Claimant, Ms A Granza, appeared in person. The Respondent, Mr S Glicksman trading as Squires Bakery, did not attend and was not represented.
The tribunal held that the Respondent made unlawful deductions from the Claimant’s wages and failed to pay arrears of holiday pay. It ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant the total sum of £1,439.85.
The written judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons will be provided unless requested in time. The judgment does not allocate the award between the two heads of claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent made unlawful deductions from wages. The judgment does not split the award between this and the holiday pay claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent failed to pay arrears of holiday pay. The judgment awards a single total sum rather than a separate figure for this head of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,440
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.