Case 3322741/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Katina Dhimpali v Intrepid Bakers Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3322741/2021
- Decision date
- 2 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge George Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Katina Dhimpali
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge George heard the matter in public by CVP on 1 May 2024. The written judgment states that the claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(c) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 because of non-compliance with the orders made on 18 January 2023 and sent to the parties on 2 April 2023.
No findings were made on the substance of the underlying employment dispute, and the judgment does not identify separate determinations on individual heads of claim. The record supplied contains no compensation or other monetary award, because the case was disposed of by strike-out rather than on the merits.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records only that 'the claim' was struck out under rule 37(1)(c) for non-compliance with the orders of 18 January 2023, sent to the parties on 2 April 2023. The text supplied does not itemise individual pleaded heads of claim or record any merits findings. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(c) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.