Case 3322803/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr P Frith (Director/owner) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3322803/2021
- Decision date
- 4 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wyeth Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the outset of the hearing the claimant confirmed that his complaints were limited to payment in lieu of unpaid holiday due on termination under the Working Time Regulations 1998 and an unauthorised deduction of wages for one hour's pay totalling £12 gross. He was not pursuing a complaint of unfair dismissal. The tribunal heard evidence from the claimant and from Mr Frith for the respondent.
The parties agreed that the holiday element of the claim totalled £280.92. There was also no dispute that there was no written contract in existence and nothing in writing authorising the respondent to make deductions from the claimant's wages. Although there had initially been a dispute about whether the claimant should have been paid for 51 hours rather than 50, Mr Frith conceded at the hearing that a further hour should be paid.
The tribunal held that the respondent was not entitled to make the deductions it accepted it had made to the claimant's wages. Applying Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998, it found that a total of £292.92 gross was due to the claimant and ordered the respondent to pay that sum.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The claimant pursued payment in lieu of unpaid holiday due on termination under the Working Time Regulations 1998. The parties agreed the holiday element totalled £280.92, and the tribunal included that sum in the final award. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant also pursued one hour's pay totalling £12 gross as an unauthorised deduction from wages. Mr Frith conceded at the hearing that the extra hour should be paid, and the tribunal held the respondent was not entitled to make the deduction. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £293
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- Regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.