Case 3322805/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Duggan-Jones v Prigmore Haulage Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3322805/2021
- Decision date
- 16 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T Brown
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Duggan-Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 30 August 2022 at Bury St Edmunds by Cloud Video Platform, Employment Judge T Brown sat alone and heard the claimant in person and the respondent represented by its Business Development Manager. The tribunal’s only substantive finding was that Mr R Duggan-Jones had suffered an unauthorised deduction from wages. It declared the deduction to be £607.27 and ordered Prigmore Haulage Limited to pay that sum to the claimant.
The judgment does not record any separate split of remedy beyond the single wage-deduction award, and no other claims or legal issues are identified in the written decision. Written reasons were not provided because reasons were given orally at the hearing and no request for written reasons was made within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal declared that the claimant suffered an unauthorised deduction from wages in the sum of £607.27 and ordered the respondent to pay that amount. | Upheld | — | £607 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £607
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.