Case 3322809/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Sobanska v Ash Residential Property Management Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3322809/2021
- Decision date
- 25 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maxwell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Sobanska
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBecause the respondent failed to present a response and the time limit had expired, the tribunal gave judgment under Rule 21. It made a protective award of 90 days' pay for Ms K Sobanska, who had been employed by the respondent until circa 31 August 2021 in its property management business at Penn House, 30 High Street, Rickmansworth.
The unlawful deductions claim was dismissed because the sums due had already been paid by the Insolvency Service and the claim was no longer pursued. The breach of contract claim succeeded, with the tribunal awarding notice pay of £3,982.10 and employer pension contributions of £103.80, giving a quantified award of £4,085.90 on that head.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Rule 21 judgment: the tribunal made a protective award of 90 days' pay for Ms K Sobanska, who had been employed by the respondent until circa 31 August 2021 in its property management business at Penn House, 30 High Street, Rickmansworth. No pound figure for the award was stated in the judgment text. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The unlawful deductions claim was dismissed because the sums due in this regard had already been paid by the Insolvency Service and the claim was no longer pursued. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract claim succeeded in respect of notice pay of £3,982.10 and employer pension contributions of £103.80. | Upheld | — | £4,086 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,086
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.