Case 3322890/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Sadgrove-Hall v Webhelp — 2023
- Case reference
- 3322890/2021
- Decision date
- 30 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wood Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Sadgrove-Hall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Watford Employment Tribunals on 15 November 2021. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Wood determined that the claim could properly be decided under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On that basis, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £2,254.88 gross. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £856.08.
The judgment records a total award of £3,110.96. No additional reasoning, legal test, or separate remedy breakdown is set out in the extracted decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined under Rule 21 because the respondent did not present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £2,255 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment describes this as the claimant's holiday entitlement; determined under Rule 21. | Upheld | — | £856 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,111
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.