Case 3322918/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Cousland v Grange Park Preschool — 2022
- Case reference
- 3322918/2021
- Decision date
- 22 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Cousland
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 14 May 2022, the Tribunal gave Mrs J Cousland an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated bases were that she had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 14 March 2022 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Ord struck out the claim on 1 July 2022.
The judgment states that the hearings fixed for 15 September 2022 and 16 to 18 January 2023 would not take place. No merits findings or remedy awards are recorded in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment struck out the claim because the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 14 March 2022 and did not make sufficient representations after the Tribunal's letter dated 14 May 2022. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment struck out the claim because the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 14 March 2022 and did not make sufficient representations after the Tribunal's letter dated 14 May 2022. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment struck out the claim because the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 14 March 2022 and did not make sufficient representations after the Tribunal's letter dated 14 May 2022. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.