Case 3322927/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Robinson (in person) For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 3322927/2021
- Decision date
- 5 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cowen Appearances
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms Robinson (in person) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe preliminary hearing considered whether the claimant was disabled within s.6 Equality Act 2010 at the time of the alleged discriminatory acts. The parties agreed that the material period ran from November 2020, when the first alleged act was said to have occurred, to 31 August 2021, when the claimant's dismissal occurred.
The tribunal found that the claimant's back pain substantially affected normal day-to-day activities from around March 2020 and continued through the relevant period despite surgery in November 2020. It also found that chronic daily migraines had substantial effects on activities including screen use, reading, language processing, concentration and conversation throughout the relevant period. The claimant was therefore found disabled by reason of back pain and migraines between March 2020 and 31 August 2021, and the disability discrimination claims were allowed to proceed.
The respondent sought a costs order because the claimant had failed to provide clean copies of documents. The tribunal accepted that clean copies should be provided, but took account of the claimant being a litigant in person and found that the annotated documents had not compromised its ability to consider the disability issue. No costs order was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary hearing decision on whether the claimant was disabled for the purposes of s.6 Equality Act 2010 during the material period. The tribunal found disability was established and stated that the disability discrimination claims shall be allowed to proceed; it did not determine the merits of the discrimination allegations. | Other | Disability | — |
| Other | Respondent's application for a costs order relating to the claimant's failure to provide clean copies of documents; no costs order was made. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.6 Equality Act 2010
- Part 1 of Schedule 1 to the Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.