Case 3322966/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Arya First v J and C Education Second Respondent: NASUWT — 2023
- Case reference
- 3322966/2021
- Decision date
- 9 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Arya First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal, sitting with Employment Judge Tobin, gave judgment on 9 February 2023 that the claim was struck out. The stated reason was that the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 22 November 2022.
The judgment does not contain any findings on the merits of the underlying claims. It records only the strike out outcome, so no liability findings or remedy assessment were made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states that the claim was struck out because the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 22 November 2022. It does not separate out merits findings for this claim. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the claim was struck out because the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 22 November 2022. It does not separate out merits findings for this claim. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim was struck out because the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 22 November 2022. It does not separate out merits findings for this claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.