Case 3322985/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Shaheir v Beyond Yonder Productions Limited Heard via Cloud Video Platform (Watford) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3322985/2021
- Decision date
- 30 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davidson Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Shaheir
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Davidson heard the matter remotely by Cloud Video Platform on 30 November 2022. The respondent, Beyond Yonder Productions Limited, did not attend. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant a total of £2,520.84.
The order breaks that total into £495.84 for arrears of pay until the termination date and £2,025.00 as compensation for automatic unfair dismissal. The extracted judgment does not set out further factual findings or reasoning for those outcomes.
No discrimination finding or protected characteristic is recorded in the judgment text provided. The written record also notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records this as arrears of pay until the termination date. | Upheld | — | £496 |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records compensation for automatic unfair dismissal, but the extracted text gives no further reasons or statutory ground. | Upheld | — | £2,025 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,521
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £2,025
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.