Case 3323012/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Joao Renato Gouveia v Metroline Travel Limited Heard — 2022
- Case reference
- 3323012/2021
- Decision date
- 2 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Saward
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Joao Renato Gouveia
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims on 22 November 2021 for notice pay, unlawful deductions from wages, and breach of contract arising from non-payment of company sick pay. The case was listed for a full merits hearing on 27 September 2022 before Employment Judge Saward sitting alone. The claimant did not attend and was not represented.
The tribunal noted that the claimant had been told on 21 September 2022 that the hearing remained listed and that, if he did not attend, Rule 47 might apply. When the hearing started, the tribunal clerk telephoned the claimant and he said he would not attend because of work and that he intended to email the tribunal, although no prior notification had been received. The tribunal also noted that the claimant had not complied with the case management orders made on 2 April 2022, and that his claim details were incomplete and unclear.
With no evidence before it, and no satisfactory explanation or request for postponement, the tribunal concluded that it was not fair or just to postpone the case of its own motion. It therefore dismissed the claimant's claims under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim. Dismissed under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the claimant did not attend or arrange representation at the merits hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the claimant did not attend or arrange representation at the merits hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Non-payment of company sick pay claim. Dismissed under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the claimant did not attend or arrange representation at the merits hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- overriding objective
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.