Case 3323067/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v King’s Hotel — 2022
- Case reference
- 3323067/2021
- Decision date
- 14 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Coll
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the claim for unlawful deduction from wages succeeded. It found that the respondent had made unlawful deductions by not paying all wages due on 31 August and 30 September 2021, and by not paying any wages due on 31 October 2021. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £2,227.
The tribunal also held that the claim for holiday pay succeeded. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £600 in respect of holiday pay arising from her period of service from 16 August to 8 October 2021. The judgment states that the claimant is responsible for any income tax and employee national insurance contributions due.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the respondent made unlawful deductions by not paying all wages due on 31 August and 30 September 2021 and not paying any wages due on 31 October 2021. | Upheld | — | £2,227 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment records that the holiday pay arose from the claimant's period of service from 16 August to 8 October 2021. | Upheld | — | £600 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,827
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.