Case 3323255/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs E Francois v Britannia Cleaning Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3323255/2021
- Decision date
- 1 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs E Francois
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal proceeded under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. It therefore made a determination on the material claims on the papers.
The tribunal found that Mrs E Francois had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and that she was entitled to a redundancy payment of £656.00. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay her holiday entitlement.
On that basis, the tribunal ordered Britannia Cleaning Limited to pay £164.00 in respect of holiday entitlement. The combined monetary award recorded in the judgment was £820.00.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Default judgment under rule 21; the tribunal stated the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £656.00. | Upheld | — | £656 |
| Holiday pay | Default judgment under rule 21; the tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered £164.00. | Upheld | — | £164 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £820
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.