Case 3323396/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Tull, in person For the v Ms C Nicolaou, solicitor — 2023
- Case reference
- 3323396/2021
- Decision date
- 5 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hunt Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Tull, in person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Watford, before Employment Judge Hunt, upheld Mr K Tull’s unlawful deduction from wages claim against Metroline West Limited. It found two separate deductions were due: £20.84 gross for 19 July 2021 and £134.89 gross for 21 to 29 July 2021 inclusive. The judgment states that these sums were only payable to the extent they had not already been paid.
The tribunal dismissed the breach of contract claim, finding it was not well-founded. It also dismissed the unfair dismissal claim, likewise finding it was not well-founded. No separate remedy was awarded for either of those claims, and the judgment records no other monetary components beyond the wage deductions.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found two unlawful deductions from wages: £20.84 gross on 19 July 2021 and £134.89 gross for 21-29 July 2021 inclusive. The sums were payable only to the extent they had not already been paid. | Upheld | — | £156 |
| Breach of contract | Found not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Found not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £156
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.