Case 3323407/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Lake v And Lawton Group Limited Telephone Private Preliminary Hearing (Case Management) — 2021
- Case reference
- 3323407/2019
- Decision date
- 3 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Lake
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a telephone preliminary hearing for case 3323407/2019 on 26 May 2020 before Employment Judge Vowles. The judgment records that the claims for wrongful dismissal (notice pay) and unauthorised deductions from wages were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant.
The judgment also records that the remaining claims for unfair dismissal, direct disability discrimination, discrimination arising from disability, and failure to make reasonable adjustments were not affected by this order and would proceed to a full merits hearing listed for 1 to 3 September 2021. No substantive findings were made on those claims in this judgment.
No monetary award was made in this decision, and the judgment does not contain any remedy assessment. It is a case management judgment only.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | Claim described as wrongful dismissal (notice pay). It was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim described as unauthorised deductions from wages. It was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.