Case 3323473/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs. D Zheleva Mr. Z Zhelev v First Choice Couriers Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3323473/2021
- Decision date
- 1 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs. D Zheleva Mr. Z Zhelev
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with case numbers 3323473/2021 and 3323474/2021 against First Choice Couriers Ltd. By a letter dated 16 April 2023, it gave the claimants an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claims should not be struck out, because the respondent had been dissolved on 1 February 2022.
The claimants did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claims. The judgment records no findings on the merits of the underlying claims and no monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Disposed of together with 3323474/2021. The extracted judgment text does not identify the substantive cause of action, and records only that the claim was struck out because the respondent had been dissolved and the claimants did not make representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | Disposed of together with 3323473/2021. The extracted judgment text does not identify the substantive cause of action, and records only that the claim was struck out because the respondent had been dissolved and the claimants did not make representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.