Case 3323489/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the Second Claimant: In person For the v Mrs Tomlin, Director — 2020
- Case reference
- 3323489/2019
- Decision date
- 2 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan Appearances
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the Second Claimant: In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard claims by Mr Stephen Black and Mrs Deborah Farrell against Cre8 Futures Limited, with no witness statements filed and the case proceeding on the parties' claim forms, limited documents, and oral evidence. Mr Black complained of unfair dismissal, redundancy payment, and unpaid wages, notice money and holiday pay. Mrs Farrell complained of redundancy payment and unpaid wages, notice money and holiday pay.
Mr Black's unfair dismissal and redundancy payment complaints were dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because he did not have the two years' qualifying service required by the Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal accepted the start date given in his claim form, found that his employment ended on 9 July 2019, and held that any work done before the employment relationship was established had been done as a founder, shareholder, director or investor rather than as an employee. The tribunal therefore did not need to resolve the parties' wider allegations about redundancy, exclusion from the premises, or related disputes.
Mrs Farrell was found to have started work on 1 June 2017 and to have had two years' continuous service by the effective date of termination. On that basis, the tribunal held that she was entitled to a redundancy payment and calculated it at £1,038.40 using a weekly wage of £346.13. It noted that she was over 41 throughout her employment, but the award was determined by the statutory redundancy formula rather than any discrimination issue.
Both claimants succeeded on their unlawful deduction claims. The tribunal found that they had been paid up to 30 June 2019, but were owed pay for 1 July 2019, two weeks' notice pay, and accrued holiday pay. It recorded that the school staff were paid pro rata through school holidays and that the respondent should have paid them through to 31 August 2019. The reasons also note that the holiday-pay date reference in paragraph 20 is internally inconsistent, but the monetary calculations are set out expressly: £2,630.75 for Mr Black and £2,630.37 for Mrs Farrell, subject to deductions for income tax and employee National Insurance as appropriate.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Mr Black's unfair dismissal complaint was dismissed because the tribunal held it had no jurisdiction: he did not have two years' qualifying service. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Mr Black's redundancy payment complaint was dismissed because the tribunal held he did not have sufficient continuous service to qualify. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Mrs Farrell's redundancy payment claim succeeded. The tribunal found she started on 1 June 2017, had two years' continuous service by 9 July 2019, and calculated the redundancy payment at 2 x 1.5 x weekly pay of £346.13. | Upheld | — | £1,038 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Mr Black succeeded on his unlawful deduction claim. The award covered one day's pay for 1 July 2019, two weeks' notice pay, and accrued holiday pay; the reasons contain an internally inconsistent date reference for the holiday period, but the calculated total is stated as £2,630.75 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,631 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Mrs Farrell succeeded on her unlawful deduction claim on the same basis as Mr Black. The award covered one day's pay for 1 July 2019, two weeks' notice pay, and accrued holiday pay, totalling £2,630.37 gross. |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,300
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.94 ERA 1996
- s.108 ERA 1996
- s.135 ERA 1996
- s.155 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.