Case 3323505/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Mower v Respondent — 2026
- Case reference
- 3323505/2019
- Decision date
- 27 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JUDGMENT
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr J Mower
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the respondent had not presented a valid response in time and determined the matter on the information before Employment Judge M Warren. In that judgment, the claimant's claims succeeded.
The only substantive remedy recorded in the extracted text is an order that the respondent pay the claimant £1,878.57 without deduction. The text does not set out any separate breakdown between claims or any additional award head.
The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying factual findings in detail, and it does not refer to any named legal tests or lay members. On the available text, the case is best recorded as a successful unlawful deduction from wages claim with a single monetary award of £1,878.57.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimant's claims succeed and orders payment of £1,878.57 without deduction. The extracted text does not separately identify any written pay statement remedy. | Upheld | — | £1,879 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,879
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.