Case 3323510/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr Rajan Luthra (Director) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3323510/2021
- Decision date
- 10 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrew Clarke
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed by Swans Day Nurseries Ltd as a Senior Nursery Practitioner and gave notice on 20 September 2021. Her notice period was three months, but she was summarily dismissed on 15 October 2021 before the notice period ended. The tribunal accepted that her pay rate was £9 per hour and found that she had three complete years' service for the purpose of the basic award.
The tribunal preferred the claimant's account of the 15 October meeting. It found that she was not under the influence of alcohol, was not told of any parental complaints before the dismissal, and was not shown the Employee Concern Forms or the statements relied on by the respondent. The tribunal rejected the respondent's case that alcohol, parental complaints, and inappropriate language were the true reasons for dismissal, finding in particular that the alcohol allegation was later fabricated and that the other allegations were not the real basis for the decision.
On that basis, the respondent failed to establish a statutory reason for dismissal under s.98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, so the dismissal was unfair. The tribunal also concluded that the respondent had not carried out a reasonable investigation or properly put the allegations to the claimant, and that her appeal was ignored. It recorded that the claimant was entitled to a basic award of £1,215.00 and a compensatory award of £3,807.00, with no tax deduction and no prescribed element.
The tribunal applied a 25% uplift under s.207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and stated the total payable as £5,325.75. It calculated the basic award by reference to 3 weeks' pay at 45 hours per week and the compensatory award by reference to the remaining 47 days of notice at 9 hours per day at £9 per hour.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed. It awarded a basic award of £1,215.00 and a compensatory award of £3,807.00, and stated that the sums awarded were to be uplifted by 25% pursuant to s.207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The judgment records the total sum payable as £5,325.75. | Upheld | — | £5,326 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,326
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,215
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £3,807
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
7 references- s.98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.98(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Burchell tests
- s.119 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- Rentplus UK Ltd v Coulson
- Acas Code of Practice number 1
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.