Case 3323512/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Davis v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 3323512/2019
- Decision date
- 13 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JUDGMENT
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Miss R Davis
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent had not presented a valid response in time, and the Employment Judge determined the matter on the information before the tribunal. The claim succeeded only in part: the tribunal awarded the claimant £321.93 for notice pay and £744.95 for holiday pay, making a total award of £1,066.88 without deduction and taxable in the claimant's hands.
In its reasons, the tribunal noted that the claimant had referred in a letter dated 13 December 2019 to matters that were not part of the case before it. It recorded that she had not brought a claim for unpaid wages, had not brought a claim for unfair dismissal, and in any event was not entitled to do so because she did not have two years' service.
The tribunal also stated that consequential post-dismissal losses could not therefore be claimed, and that compensation for stress and anxiety could not be awarded in respect of notice pay and holiday pay claims. No separate remedy beyond the two monetary awards was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Awarded in respect of notice pay. | Upheld | — | £322 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded in respect of holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £745 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,067
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.