Case 3323547/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Chadderton v Everyday Loans Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3323547/2019
- Decision date
- 14 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Chadderton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy judgment dated 14 October 2021, Employment Judge Anstis struck out the respondent's response under rule 37. The Tribunal had previously written on 25 September 2021 giving the respondent an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the response should not be struck out for non-compliance with the Tribunal's order of 16 June 2021.
The judgment records that the respondent failed to make written representations, or failed to make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The response was therefore struck out. The judgment also states that the respondent remained entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions, but could only participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The respondent's response was struck out under rule 37 after the Tribunal's order of 16 June 2021 was not complied with and, following the letter dated 25 September 2021, the respondent did not make written representations or request a hearing, or did not make any sufficient representations. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.