Case 3323548/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Angel Mirembe First v BlackLion Law LLP t/a ClaimLion Law Second Respondent: Ms K Fenton — 2024
- Case reference
- 3323548/2021
- Decision date
- 7 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Young Members
- Venue
- Watford
- Panel members
- Mrs S Boot, Ms A Telfer
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Angel Mirembe First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Watford on 8, 10-12 and 15 January 2024 before Employment Judge Young, Mrs S Boot and Ms A Telfer. The Claimant, Ms Angel Mirembe First, appeared as a litigant in person; the First and Second Respondents were represented by counsel.
The written judgment records only the outcome: the Employment Tribunal unanimously decided that all of the Claimant's complaints failed and that the claim was dismissed. The record does not set out the tribunal's reasons in written form because the reasons were given orally at the hearing.
No monetary award is recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The written judgment records that all of the Claimant's complaints failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The written judgment records that all of the Claimant's complaints failed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.