Case 3323560/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Dias v Mill Hill School Foundation — 2023
- Case reference
- 3323560/2021
- Decision date
- 9 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Dias
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 1 March 2023, Employment Judge Quill sitting alone at Watford considered the respondent's application to strike out the claimant's complaints. The judgment records that the claimant, Ms L Dias, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr Rowland, solicitor.
The tribunal struck out all and any complaint of unfair dismissal. It held that, taking into account the claimant's length of service and the alleged reason for dismissal, the proposed unfair dismissal complaint was not within the tribunal's jurisdiction. The judgment also stated, in the alternative, that any unfair dismissal complaint based on section 100 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was struck out because it had no reasonable prospects of success.
The judgment says that the other complaints were not struck out. Those other complaints were described in the case management summary sent to the parties, but their substance is not set out in this short written judgment. The reasons for refusing the respondent's application were given orally, and written reasons were included in the case management summary.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out all and any complaint of unfair dismissal because, taking into account the claimant's length of service and the alleged dismissal reason, the proposed complaint was said not to be within the tribunal's jurisdiction. In the alternative, any unfair dismissal complaint based on section 100 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was also struck out because it had no reasonable prospects of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 100 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.