Case 3323566/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms RN Asamoah v Icleaning — 2021
- Case reference
- 3323566/2019
- Decision date
- 6 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms RN Asamoah
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response having been received from the respondent, Employment Judge Ord entered judgment under rule 21 on the claimant's claim. The tribunal found that Ms RN Asamoah was unfairly dismissed by Icleaning.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had suffered unlawful deductions from wages and had not been paid for accrued holiday entitlement. In addition, it found that she was dismissed in breach of contract.
The judgment did not determine remedy. It states that a separate hearing to determine the remedy to which the claimant is entitled was listed for 12 January 2021.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Rule 21 judgment entered because no response was received. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant had suffered unlawful deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant had not been paid for accrued holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.