Case 3323578/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr A Williams, solicitor UNANIMOUS — 2021
- Case reference
- 3323578/2019
- Decision date
- 12 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams Members
- Panel members
- Mrs J Smith, Mr S Woodward
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Watford by Employment Judge Hyams, with Mrs J Smith and Mr S Woodward as members, on 11 and 12 March 2021. The claimant appeared in person and the respondents were represented by Mr A Williams, solicitor.
The tribunal held that the claimant's race discrimination claim was brought outside the primary time limit, which it recorded as three months in the circumstances. It found that it was not just and equitable to extend time, and therefore held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear that claim.
The claimant's claim for unpaid wages was, by agreement, found not well-founded and was dismissed. The judgment records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The tribunal held the race discrimination claim was presented outside the primary time limit, found it was not just and equitable to extend time, and therefore said it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claim. | Other | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The unpaid wages claim was by agreement not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.