Case 3323603/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Dabiri v William Hill Organisation Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3323603/2019
- Decision date
- 5 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maxwell
- Panel members
- Mrs K Charman, Mr S Woodward
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Dabiri
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Watford by CVP on 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 August 2022 before Employment Judge Maxwell with Mrs K Charman and Mr S Woodward. The tribunal dismissed Miss N Dabiri's claims of unfair dismissal, direct discrimination, discrimination arising from disability, and victimisation, finding each was not well founded.
No monetary award or other remedy is recorded in the extracted judgment text. The extracted reasons do not set out any separate legal test beyond the claim descriptions and the conclusion that the claims failed.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The judgment records a claim of direct discrimination, but the extracted text does not identify the protected characteristic. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.