Case 3323615/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Laura Warner v CenterParcs Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3323615/2019
- Decision date
- 4 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Laura Warner
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was an open preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Alliott sitting alone on 7 August 2020, following an earlier order to consider strike out and deposit issues. The tribunal applied the approach that strike out or deposit applications must be assessed on the claimant's case at its highest, and noted that discrimination claims are only struck out in the clearest cases because they are fact sensitive.
The tribunal considered the claimant's unfair dismissal and disability discrimination complaints but did not strike them out. On unfair dismissal, the dismissal had been with immediate effect on 22 August 2019 after an incident on 4 August 2019 in the Plant Room, and there was a dispute about what the health and safety instructions and training required, including whether the claimant should have worn full PPE. On disability discrimination, the claimant said she had anxiety, vasovagal attacks and menorrhagia; the tribunal could not decide at that stage whether she met the Equality Act 2010 definition of disability and ordered further particulars of how the claim was put.
The only claim finally determined at this hearing was the detriment claim for making a protected disclosure. The claimant relied on a section 15 allegation about pool observation checks and said the detriment was a warning in September 2018 for leaving the pool unattended. The tribunal held that this was a single free-standing event more than a year before the claim form, concluded that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success because it was out of time, and found there was no prospect of extending time on a just and equitable basis. It therefore struck out that head of claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Claim for detriment for making a protected disclosure was struck out. The tribunal found it was well out of time because the alleged detriment was a warning in September 2018 for leaving the pool unattended, more than one year before the claim form was presented, and it found no prospect of extending time on a just and equitable basis. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- no reasonable prospect of success
- just and equitable basis
- range of reasonable responses
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.