Case 3323638/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Oxborough v Diageo Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3323638/2021
- Decision date
- 21 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Oxborough
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short judgment on case management rather than the merits. The Tribunal had written to the claimant on 26 June 2022 giving an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out, because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's letter of 13 May 2022 and the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Tobin struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on liability or remedy, and no award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The extracted judgment does not restate the substantive claim type, but the gov.uk listing identifies the case as Unfair Dismissal. The claim was struck out after the claimant failed to make written representations, or any sufficient representations, in response to the Tribunal's letter of 26 June 2022 concerning non-compliance with the Tribunal's letter of 13 May 2022 and the fact that the claim had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.