Case 3323670/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Issar, friend For the v Mr E Duffield, solicitor — 2020
- Case reference
- 3323670/2019
- Decision date
- 8 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Issar, friend For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing before Employment Judge R Lewis at Watford on 8 June 2020 was concluded by consent. The written judgment records that the claimant’s claims of discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation, direct discrimination on grounds of race or sex, and claims in relation to protected disclosures (whistleblowing) were all dismissed on withdrawal.
No substantive liability findings or remedy award are recorded in the written decision. The record also states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing, so no written reasons were provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sexual orientation discrimination | Dismissed on withdrawal by consent. | Withdrawn | Sexual orientation | — |
| Race discrimination | Part of the claim described as direct discrimination on grounds of race or sex; dismissed on withdrawal by consent. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | Part of the claim described as direct discrimination on grounds of race or sex; dismissed on withdrawal by consent. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Whistleblowing | Claim in relation to public interest disclosure; dismissed on withdrawal by consent. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.