Case 3323671/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Wells v Tesco Stores Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3323671/2021
- Decision date
- 21 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Byrne Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Wells
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the claim for unfair dismissal, stating that it was not upheld. The tribunal also dismissed the claim for breach of contract on the same basis.
The claim for unauthorised deduction of wages was dismissed pursuant to Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure following withdrawal of that claim by the Claimant. No remedy award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states the claim for unfair dismissal is not upheld and is dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states the claim for breach of contract is not upheld and is dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states the unauthorised deduction of wages claim was dismissed following withdrawal by the Claimant under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.