Case 3323674/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Partnerships In Care — 2020
- Case reference
- 3323674/2019
- Decision date
- 6 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Vernon Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a face-to-face preliminary hearing in Cardiff on 29 September 2020, before Employment Judge Vernon, the claimant appeared in person with the support of a friend and the respondent was represented by counsel. The tribunal made only a procedural ruling on limitation and granted the claimant's request for an extension of time under section 123(1)(b) of the Equality Act 2010 to 2 October 2019.
The written record does not set out any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying Equality Act claim, and it records no award of compensation or other remedy. It is therefore a decision limited to the time-limit application rather than the underlying discrimination issues.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | At a preliminary hearing, the tribunal granted the claimant's request for an extension of time under section 123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010 to present the claim by 2 October 2019. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.