Case 3323679/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 3323679/2019
- Decision date
- 2 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Moore Appearances
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant had worked on the family farm since 5 September 1994. After his father's death on 15 June 2019, K changed the locks on farm sheds on 7 July 2019 and refused to give the claimant a key. The claimant was signed off work with stress from 8 July 2019 and said he was not paid from May 2019 onwards. He treated the employment as having ended on 2 October 2019.
On the wages claim, the tribunal accepted that two later underpayments were proved from the claimant's second schedule of loss and spreadsheets, totalling £3,084.52. It rejected the earlier 2017 underpayments because they were out of time under section 23(4A) ERA 1996. The pension-contribution element of the wages claim was dismissed because the claimant did not challenge the respondent's evidence on that issue.
The holiday pay claim succeeded in the sum of £3,180.81, which the respondent accepted during the hearing. On constructive unfair dismissal, the tribunal held that the respondent's failure to pay wages and sick pay was a fundamental breach of contract and that the claimant resigned in response to that breach. It found that the lock changes were not material to liability, although it described them as an act of retaliation and assertion of control arising from the family dispute.
For remedy, the tribunal calculated the basic award on a weekly figure of £396.31 and a 19.5 multiplier, producing £7,728.05. It calculated the compensatory award using net weekly earnings of £441.78, a 41-week loss period, mitigation earnings of £7,429, and accepted sums for loss of statutory rights and pension benefits, giving £11,331.71. It rejected the separate claim for £948 in sick-pay differential because that loss did not flow from the dismissal. The total award was £25,325.09.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal accepted two unpaid wage items totalling £3,084.52; the earlier 2017 underpayment items were outside the two-year limit in section 23(4A) ERA 1996, and the pension-contribution element was dismissed. | Upheld | — | £3,085 |
| Holiday pay | The respondent accepted liability for unpaid holiday pay during the hearing. | Upheld | — | £3,181 |
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal found that non-payment of wages and sick pay was a fundamental breach and that the claimant resigned in response. The basic award was £7,728.05 and the compensatory award was £11,331.71, making £19,059.76 on the unfair dismissal claim. | Upheld | — | £11,332 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £25,325
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £7,728
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £11,332
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
5 references- constructive dismissal four-limb test
- section 23(4A) ERA 1996
- section 223 ERA 1996
- section 234(1) ERA 1996
- Toni & Guys (St Pauls Ltd) v Georgiou UKEAT/0085/13/DM
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.