Case 3323695/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Kalra v Walkers Snack Foods Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3323695/2019
- Decision date
- 18 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Kalra
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claimant’s age-related harassment complaints because she had been ordered to pay a £75 deposit per allegation following a preliminary hearing on 30 June 2021, and that deposit was not paid. The order was sent to the claimant on 16 August 2021, and the tribunal applied rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The judgment states that the claimant’s remaining claims, described as unlawful racial harassment, would proceed to a hearing. No determination was made in this judgment on those remaining claims.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The claimant was ordered at a preliminary hearing on 30 June 2021 to pay a deposit of £75 per allegation of age-related harassment. The order was sent on 16 August 2021, the claimant did not pay the deposit, and the tribunal struck out the age-related harassment complaints under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. | Struck out | Age | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.