Case 3323716/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr Ian Blackmore — 2020
- Case reference
- 3323716/2019
- Decision date
- 3 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, engaged from 23 May 2013 on documents describing him as self-employed, said he worked only for the respondent, could not send a substitute, and was subject to the respondent’s control over hours, tasks, place of work and work schedule. The respondent did not press a challenge to employee status at the hearing. The tribunal found, on an overall assessment of the relationship, that the claimant provided personal service, that there was mutuality of obligation, that he took little financial risk, and that the economic reality was that he was an employee.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy on 1 August 2019, with his last working day on 29 August 2019. It held that he was entitled to a redundancy payment. Using his date of birth of 15 May 1972 and 6 full years of employment, the tribunal calculated the payment at 9 weeks x £525, producing £4,725.
On holiday pay, the tribunal found there was no express holiday year and that the holiday year ran from 23 June to 22 June. It accepted the claimant’s evidence that he worked 4 days a week at £180 per day, giving an annual entitlement of 24 days including bank holidays. From 22 June 2019 to 29 August 2019, 4.5 days had accrued but not been paid, amounting to £810.
The tribunal also accepted that the claimant had taken 2 weeks’ holiday in the 2018-2019 holiday year and was still entitled to the 8 bank holidays, so 16 days’ holiday pay remained unpaid for that year. It treated that element as an unauthorised deduction of wages claim, found it was presented in time, and awarded £2,880. It rejected any further holiday pay award for earlier years because those payments were outside the three-month period and did not form a series of deductions.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy. It found he was 47 at dismissal and had 6 full years of employment, producing a redundancy payment of 9 x £525 = £4,725. | Upheld | — | £4,725 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £3,690 gross. It treated the 2018-2019 holiday pay element as an unauthorised deduction claim for limitation purposes, awarded £810 for 4.5 days accrued on termination and £2,880 for the earlier holiday year, and made no further award for prior years because they were out of time and not a series of deductions. | Upheld | — | £3,690 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,415
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.