Case 3323717/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Lardner v Enchanted Play Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 3323717/2019
- Decision date
- 21 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bartlett
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Lardner
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr K Lardner, brought a claim for unlawful deductions from wages against Enchanted Play Ltd under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. This was determined as a Rule 21 judgment after the respondent failed to present a response to the claim.
The tribunal recorded that notice of the claim and a request to respond were sent to the respondent on 21 October 2019, and that no response had been received by the time of the decision. The claimant provided his hourly rate, hours worked, and a calculation of the amount claimed, and the tribunal accepted that evidence as undisputed. The claim was therefore upheld in the amount of £2,209.00.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. Notice of the claim and a request to respond were sent to the respondent on 21 October 2019, but no response was received, so the tribunal determined the claim in the claimant's favour. | Upheld | — | £2,209 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,209
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.