Case 3323848/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Glew v “1st Call Cleaning Services Ltd” — 2022
- Case reference
- 3323848/2021
- Decision date
- 30 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms D Glew
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal recorded that the respondent business used “Ltd” in its trading name but had not supplied a company number, and it said it was unclear whether the business was a genuine company or was falsely holding itself out as one.
The tribunal found that there was a contract between Ms D Glew and the respondent and that she provided services personally as a worker. On that basis, it held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages.
The claim for unlawful deduction from wages was therefore upheld. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £806.75.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £806.75. | Upheld | — | £807 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £807
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.