Case 3323849/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms G Fleet v Laden Seymour trading as 4 Fun Factory — 2021
- Case reference
- 3323849/2019
- Decision date
- 17 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laidler Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms G Fleet
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was determined at a remote hearing on the papers on 30 April 2021. The respondent, Laden Seymour trading as 4 Fun Factory, did not enter a response. Employment Judge Laidler gave judgment for the claimant, Ms G Fleet, in respect of unpaid wages.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £3,114.00. The judgment recorded the calculation as 48 initial hours at £9 per hour, producing £432.00; 326 hours between 15 June and 15 July at £9 per hour, producing £2,934.00; less £1,467.00 already paid, leaving £1,467.00 due for that period; and 135 hours between 15 July and 5 August at £9 per hour, producing £1,215.00. The final total award was recorded as £3,114.00 gross.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £3,114.00 in respect of unpaid wages. The judgment set out the calculation by reference to hours worked at £9 per hour, less sums already paid. | Upheld | — | £3,114 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,114
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.