Claimant v Ecoheat Solutions Ltd — 2020

Case reference: 3323944/2019
Decision date: 18 November 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Daniels

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Respondent

Ecoheat Solutions Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This judgment concerned the respondents' written application for reconsideration dated 24 July 2020 in the case of Mr Partridge v Ecoheat Solutions Ltd. Employment Judge Daniels dismissed the application. The judgment states that the three deposit orders made in the case were to stand.

The respondents also sought reconsideration of the strike out warning order at paragraph 1.3 of the order dated 6 July 2020. That application was also dismissed, and the order at paragraph 1.3 was to stand.

The judge recorded that, having carefully considered the respondent's submissions, there was no reasonable prospect of the original decisions being varied pursuant to Rule 72(1).

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	Judgment on the respondents' application for reconsideration dated 24 July 2020. The application was dismissed, including the challenge to the strike out warning order at para 1.3 of the order dated 6 July 2020. The judge said there was no reasonable prospect of the original decisions being varied under Rule 72(1).	Dismissed	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.