Case 3323945/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Pecucha v NFT Distribution Operations Ltd (In Administration) — 2021
- Case reference
- 3323945/2019
- Decision date
- 16 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Pecucha
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was Mr M Pecucha and the respondent was NFT Distribution Operations Ltd. The tribunal did not determine the merits of the underlying claim. It struck out the claim because the respondent company was in administration and the required consent of the administrator or permission of the court had not been obtained to institute or continue the proceedings under the Insolvency Act 1986.
The tribunal also recorded that on 10 March 2021 the claimant was given an opportunity to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued. No acceptable reason was provided. For those reasons, Employment Judge R Lewis ordered that the claim be struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the claim because the respondent was in administration and neither the administrator's consent nor court permission had been obtained under the Insolvency Act 1986. The tribunal also noted that on 10 March 2021 the claimant had been given an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued, but no acceptable reason was provided. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.