Case 3324019/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Marciniak v Care Comm 2011 Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3324019/2019
- Decision date
- 24 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms D Marciniak
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Hyams Date entered judgment for Ms D Marciniak against Care Comm 2011 Limited. The tribunal found that the respondent owed the claimant £13,688.64 gross by way of unpaid wages.
The tribunal also awarded £33.39 as compensation for financial loss suffered because those wages were not paid. In addition, it found that the respondent owed the claimant £546.09 gross by way of unpaid notice pay.
The judgment is a short one-page decision and sets out the monetary awards only. No further reasoning or breakdown beyond those sums is recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered £13,688.64 gross for unpaid wages and £33.39 as compensation for financial loss caused by the failure to pay those wages. | Upheld | — | £13,722 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal ordered £546.09 gross for unpaid notice pay. | Upheld | — | £546 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,268
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 - Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.