Mr M Sims v Coretex Industries — 2021

Case reference: 3324027/2019
Decision date: 24 September 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Ord Dated

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr M Sims

Respondent

Coretex Industries

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal struck out Mr M Sims' claim against Coretex Industries. It found that the respondent company had been dissolved and that the claimant had not applied to have it restored to the Register of Companies.

The tribunal had previously given the claimant an opportunity on 4 July 2021 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason.

On that basis, Employment Judge Ord ordered that the claim be struck out. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying employment claims or any monetary award.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment does not identify the underlying causes of action; it states only that the claim was struck out because the respondent company had been dissolved, the claimant had not applied to have it restored to the Register of Companies, and the claimant failed to give an acceptable reason after being given an opportunity on 4 July 2021 to explain why the claim should not be struck out for lack of active pursuit.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.