Case 3324030/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Sturgeon v Saint Flooring South Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3324030/2019
- Decision date
- 28 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Sturgeon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 16 May 2020, the Tribunal gave Mr Sturgeon an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for non-compliance with the Tribunal's order dated 2 March 2020 and because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that the claimant failed to make written representations, or failed to make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37. The hearing fixed for 2 September 2020 was vacated and did not take place. The judgment does not contain any merits findings on the underlying employment claims and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Strike out under rule 37 for failure to comply with the Tribunal's order dated 2/3/2020 and because the claim had not been actively pursued. The judgment does not determine the underlying substantive claims on their merits. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.