Case 3324109/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Tejan-Savage v Total Security Services (TSS) Limited v — 2021
- Case reference
- 3324109/2019
- Decision date
- 17 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth
- Panel members
- Mr C Davie, Mr A Morgan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Tejan-Savage
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Reading by CVP on 16 and 17 November 2021 before Employment Judge Hawksworth with lay members Mr C Davie and Mr A Morgan, gave a unanimous decision dismissing all claims. It rejected the complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages, which related to the claimant's hourly rate of pay and entitlement to travel expenses.
The tribunal also dismissed the direct race discrimination complaint concerning the removal of the claimant's shifts. On the dismissal issues, it found that the claimant was not dismissed and did not resign in July 2019, so the complaints of unfair dismissal and constructive unfair dismissal failed. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint in respect of the claimant's hourly rate of pay and entitlement to travel expenses. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Direct race discrimination complaint in respect of the removal of the claimant's shifts. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Complaint of unfair dismissal/constructive unfair dismissal; the tribunal found the claimant was not dismissed and did not resign in July 2019. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | Same complaint bundle as the unfair dismissal complaint; the tribunal found the claimant was not dismissed and did not resign in July 2019. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.